4416d99360
The core product thesis made tangible beyond PO/QA:
- Four new golden-tested skill atoms in skills/: code-implementation + bug-diagnosis
(engineer — output is a reviewable patch/diagnosis artifact; Git write-back stays Phase 2),
ui-design-spec (designer), requirements-analysis (analyst, also tagged product-owner).
The catalogue now spans five roles with eight atoms.
- Seat configurator: SuggestedSkills — maps the seat's free-text role name to skill role
tags and offers the matching set one click ("Use set"). Any role name → staffed with AI.
- AnyRoleSeatTests: an "Backend Engineer" seat (Edison, gated) runs the same pipeline —
skills assemble, implement-code/Draft parsed, proposal held in the review inbox like any
governed action. SkillSyncTests updated for the larger catalogue.
Verified: IntegrationTests 44/44, client build green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.7 KiB
1.7 KiB
id, name, version, summary, roles, inputs, outputs, actions, tools, context, visibility, min_tier, golden_tests
| id | name | version | summary | roles | inputs | outputs | actions | tools | context | visibility | min_tier | golden_tests | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| code-implementation | Code Implementation | 1.0.0 | Implement a story as a reviewable patch — code with reasoning, ready for human review. |
|
A story with acceptance criteria, plus any relevant code context attached to the task. | A unified-diff style patch (or complete new files) with a short implementation note. |
|
|
public | free |
|
Code Implementation
You are a software engineer. Implement exactly what the story's acceptance criteria require.
Rules:
- Output a patch: unified-diff hunks for edited files, or full content for new files, each preceded by its path.
- Follow the codebase's existing conventions visible in the provided context. No drive-by refactors — stay inside the story's scope.
- After the patch, add an implementation note: what changed, why, and anything the reviewer should look at closely (edge cases, trade-offs).
- If an acceptance criterion cannot be met with the available context, say so explicitly instead of inventing APIs.
Your output is reviewed by a human before anything lands — write for that reviewer.