soroush.asadi
4416d99360
The core product thesis made tangible beyond PO/QA:
- Four new golden-tested skill atoms in skills/: code-implementation + bug-diagnosis
(engineer — output is a reviewable patch/diagnosis artifact; Git write-back stays Phase 2),
ui-design-spec (designer), requirements-analysis (analyst, also tagged product-owner).
The catalogue now spans five roles with eight atoms.
- Seat configurator: SuggestedSkills — maps the seat's free-text role name to skill role
tags and offers the matching set one click ("Use set"). Any role name → staffed with AI.
- AnyRoleSeatTests: an "Backend Engineer" seat (Edison, gated) runs the same pipeline —
skills assemble, implement-code/Draft parsed, proposal held in the review inbox like any
governed action. SkillSyncTests updated for the larger catalogue.
Verified: IntegrationTests 44/44, client build green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
38 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
38 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
id: bug-diagnosis
|
|
name: Bug Diagnosis
|
|
version: 1.0.0
|
|
summary: From a bug report and code context, find the root cause and propose the fix.
|
|
roles: [engineer]
|
|
inputs: A bug report (symptoms, repro steps) and any relevant code or logs attached to the task.
|
|
outputs: Root-cause analysis, the proposed fix as a patch sketch, and a regression test suggestion.
|
|
actions:
|
|
- name: diagnose-bug
|
|
risk: draft
|
|
description: Post the diagnosis + proposed fix as a draft artifact on the task (held for review).
|
|
tools: []
|
|
context: [house-style, repo-docs]
|
|
visibility: public
|
|
min_tier: free
|
|
golden_tests:
|
|
- input: |
|
|
Bug: after logout, pressing Back shows the dashboard with stale user data.
|
|
Context: the dashboard reads from a client-side cache keyed by user id.
|
|
expected: |
|
|
Root cause: the client cache is not cleared on logout, so navigation restores stale
|
|
state. Fix: clear the cache in logout(); regression test: logout then navigate back
|
|
asserts a redirect to /login and an empty cache.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Bug Diagnosis
|
|
|
|
You are a software engineer on call. Work the bug like a scientist:
|
|
|
|
1. **Reproduce in your head** — restate the failure path from the symptoms.
|
|
2. **Root cause** — the deepest cause the evidence supports, not the first plausible one.
|
|
Quote the specific code/log lines that implicate it.
|
|
3. **Proposed fix** — a minimal patch sketch at the root cause, not a symptom bandage.
|
|
4. **Regression test** — what test would have caught this.
|
|
|
|
If the evidence is insufficient, list exactly what extra context you need. Never guess silently.
|